The new Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, says there will be a referendum to enshrine a voice an Indigenous representative body in the Australian constitution. He used the arguments against it to mount a roundabout challenge to the jurisdiction of the court. Terra nullius presents a second puzzle as well. That was Eddie Mabos gift. They are frequently set down as too stupid to be taught, and barely raised above brutes, remarked the Reverend Henry William Haygarth. William Pridden, Australia, Its History and Present Condition, 2d ed. %%EOF 0000009196 00000 n What circumstances lead to the abolishment of terra nullius?Q5. Today in the midst of winter there is still smoke from a campfire, framing a word spelled out on the lawn: Sovereignty. Macquarie had no need to say that. I have heard it at dawn as the earth crackles, the river waters run, and the animals stir as the Sun peers above the hills and the light strikes the trees on my beloved Wiradjuri country. Sometimes the comparison was meant to be a metaphor. In Britain and Australia there were vocal, powerful people, both inside and outside the government, who urged that terra nullius had been a terrible injustice to the Aborigines. The most familiar statement of this view was again from Vattel, who held that nonagricultural peoples unsettled habitation in these immense regions cannot be accounted a true and legal possession and that European farmers accordingly might lawfully settle on their land. An alternative plan might have been to recognize Aboriginal ownership only of certain parts of the continent, thus freeing up the rest for British settlement, and not interfering with the land titles of any existing owners. Later as Australia grew and colonists entered the Torres Strait, Ned Mosby helped his community by protecting them through his negotiation powers and navigating the impacts of colonisation. Beginning in the 1820s, these doubts began to ripen into an apparently widespread belief, in both Britain and Australia, that terra nullius was an injustice toward the Aborigines. We know sadness. As John Bede Polding, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Sydney, urged in 1845, if it is necessary for the purposes of civilized life, to occupy his land, the government should see that it is not taken away without remuneration.[71]. Collins, An Account of the English Colony, 327. The invasion of Sydney by the First Fleet in 1788 has meaning for all Aboriginal peoples. Australia is the only major Commonwealth country (referring to British settler colonial countries) in the world that does not have a treaty with its First Nations peoples. Elders saythe wateris now a battleground. The Aborigines might not have the right to oppose having their land taken, but they would have a right to be reimbursed for the lands value afterwards. They are the natural, and in the strictest sense of the word, the legal possessors of the several Regions they inhabit, Douglas reasoned. 54. 14. James Holman, Travels in China, New Zealand, New South Wales, Van Diemens Land, Cape Horn, etc., etc., 2d ed. With reference to the instructions Cook received to gain the consent of the Indigenous inhabitants before claiming territory, research and compare the colonisation of Australia to that of New Zealand. xref Torrens to Grey, Dec. 1835, CO 13/3, p. 161, PRO; First Annual Report of the Colonization Commissioners for South Australia, 14 June 1836, British Parliamentary Papers: Colonies: Australia, 4:480; Second Letter of Instructions by the Colonization Commissioners for South Australia to James Hurtle Fisher, Esq., Resident Commissioner in South Australia, 8 Oct. 1836, British Parliamentary Papers: Colonies: Australia, 5:192. Historical Records of Australia, series IV, 1:414. But once terra nullius had been implemented, it could not be stopped, even when British opinion about the Aborigines began to change. 37. When Macquarie set aside ten thousand acres in 1820, for example, he explained that it was because the rapid increase of British population, and the consequent occupancy of the lands formerly dwelt on by the Natives, [had] driven these harmless creatures to more remote situations. Two years later, Macquarie again reported that the Aborigines were entitled to the peculiar protection of the British government, on account of their being driven from the sea-coast by our settling thereon, and subsequently occupying their best hunting grounds in the interior. Governor George Gipps acknowledged the Aborigines as the original possessors of the soil from which the wealth of the Colony has been principally derived.[74] But when land was set aside, it was done in the manner Angas described, analogous to a trust with the Aborigines as beneficiaries and settlers as trustees, with the power to make the important decisions. This is an edited extract of the 2022 Mabo Lecture, delivered by Stan Grant on June 3, 2022, to commemorate 30 years since the Mabo decision. from the Earl of Morton, which included the following advice about the Indigenous occupants: This sketch, which shows the land divisions of different family groups on Murray Island, formed part of the evidence in the Mabo case. 0000003049 00000 n Of law. Australia had neither been conquered by Britain nor ceded to Britain by the Aborigines, contended defense counsel in a third case. West Stack Story: collection delivery video, Copies and interlibrary loans for individuals, Copies and interlibrary loans for libraries, Charges, payment methods and service levels, Copyright and document supply for libraries, Australian Interlibrary Resource Sharing (ILRS) Code, Copying and re-using works with Indigenous cultural content. Section 1: Aboriginal history and culture, Section 2: Aboriginal cultural protocols and practices, Section 3: Initial contact and colonisation of Australia, Section 4: Exclusion, Control, Segregation and Assimilation Policies, Section 5: Aboriginal land rights and native title rights, Section 6: The fight for human rights and equality, Section 7: Self-determination and community, Section 8: Road to reconciliation, recognition and reparations, Section 9: Aboriginal people in NSW today, Section 10: Government working with community to heal. Terra nullius was overturned in the High Court of Australias Mabo decision in 1992, which recognised Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples continuing connection and rights to land through Native Title. He managed to secure the consent of a local chief to sell the island of Lemane, 400 miles up the Gambia River, for an annuity of 7 pounds 10 shillings a year. 31. Within a few months of landing, the naval captain John Hunter recognized that they have one fixed residence, and the tribe takes its name from the place of their general residence. This fact was not evident to the casual observer, Hunter explained. 0000007051 00000 n Under different circumstances, the British might nevertheless have purchased the land. By 1860, nearly 12,000 African Americans had returned to Africa. Grey to Mercer, 14 April 1836, Historical Records of Australia, series I, 18:390. We are still trying to find the words to equal the full measure of Eddie Mabo's devotion. Colonial attitudes toward indigenous people were not formed entirely, or even mostly, in Europe. To solve this problem the English said that because the island is in the state of Terra Nullius when it was discovered 1794. The Principal Men of the Country disputed the right of the Chief to dispose of the Island, and to obtain their Consent the expence of the Purchase was increased. The government had to reimburse Bradley for 375 worth of goods he distributed to satisfy these other claims. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples should be advised that there may be images of people who have passed away., Terra nullius is today used as a catch-all phrase to explain how Australia was founded; to justify and legitimise the dispossession, dispersal, and inhumane treatment of First Nations peoples. But after all his testimony, when the committee finally asked him what he proposed as a solution, all Angas could suggest was that ten percent of the colonys land not yet sold to settlers should be set aside for the use of the Aborigines. Dredge (about whom more below) was one of the growing number of Britons critical of terra nullius. Great things ought to be done, Brisbane told Walker. To deny the capacity of the Indians to sell land would have been to upset the settled expectations of a substantial number of settlers. They knew not how to put a cup to their mouth but when presented with anything to drink would put their chin in the vessel. And their unfamiliarity with cups was nothing compared with their utter lack of clothing or adequate shelter. Had Australia not been a penal colony, the first British settlers might have been scattered missionaries and whalers, who would have been less able than the government to seize Aboriginal land by force. In 1768 the Royal Society hired James Cook to take a ship to the South Pacific to observe the transit of Venus across the sun, the measurement of which, from several parts of the world simultaneously, would help astronomers determine the distance between the sun and the earth. Many, in any event, believed that the land reserves being set aside were compensation enough. The abolitionist movement was an organized effort to end the practice of slavery in the United States. Image credit: gadigal yilimung (shield) madeby UncleCharlesChickaMadden. In a snapshot. It is a feeling. C. P. Billot, John Batman: The Story of John Batman and the Founding of Melbourne (Melbourne: Hyland House, 1979), 79102; Alistair H. Campbell, John Batman and the Aborigines (Malmsbury, Vic. Some could see the Aborigines side of things. Richard M. Gummere (New York: G. P. Putnams Sons, 1920), 2:423. One of the advantages of this site, explained the government committee responsible for choosing the location of the penal colony, was that it was highly probable that the Natives would without resistance acquiesce in ceding as much land as may be necessary for a stipulated rent.[9] In the end, Das Voltas Bay was rejected too, and the government turned to Australia. The movement achieved many successes, such as the abolition of slavery in the colonies. Learn how colonists used the European system of awarding breast plates and titles to control their diplomatic relationship with the Aboriginal peoples. Would the British be helping or hurting the Aborigines by allowing them to deny colonists access to land? Debunking the hunter-gatherer label, Pascoe relies on the writing and illustrations of early explorers and colonists to support his argument that Indigenous Australians had lived in settlements, and developed complex agricultural and land-management systems over thousands of years. Terra nullius was sophistry of law, declared the scientist P. E. de Strzelecki, after four years of exploring Australia and discovering that the Aborigines were as strongly attached to property, and to the rights which it involves, as any European political body. James Dredge resigned in protest as Assistant Protector of Aborigines, in part, he explained, because they have been treated unjustly; their country has been taken from them, and with it their means of subsistencewhilst no equivalent has been substituted. Again and again, commentators asked: Has the Government a right to take possession of the country, and, without any consent from the original proprietors, sell the land to settlers? Farmers developed property in their land. Create your own unique website with customizable templates. As governor, King was the man ultimately responsible for implementing the policy of terra nullius, by granting parcels of Crown land and coordinating the colonys defense against the Aborigines. Under English property law, the Aborigines did not exist. All human societies had begun in the state of nature, but most of them had progressed since then, and one of the ways in which they had progressed was by assigning property rights in land. You can find it still, somewhere buried in the archives of ABC News. They built only the most rudimentary kind of shelter, small hovels not much bigger than an oven, made of pieces of Sticks, Bark, Grass &c.;, and even these are seldom used but in the wet seasons. And most important of all, Cook explained, the Natives know nothing of Cultivation. Unlike the Indians of eastern North America, and unlike the Polynesians Cook met on the way to Australia, the Aborigines were not farmers. 58. When we deprive them of their lands and means of subsistence, in justice we ought to remunerate them, declared a witness before a committee of the New South Wales Legislative Council in 1838; the land being their property until usurped by us. Colonization increased the value of the land so much, reasoned the penal reformer Alexander Maconochie, that even if part of the increase was paid to the Aborigines, there will always be found in judicious colonization a large balance for ourselves. Proponents of compensation conceived of the plan along the lines of the governments power of eminent domain. I had read about the case as it moved through the lower courts. We go on, he said, ever, ever, ever on. Greek and Roman writers were unanimous in holding that property was a man-made institution. George Worgan, a surgeon with the First Fleet, found it difficult to touch one of them, for they are Ugly to Disgust. The aborigines of New South Wales are the ugliest race of beings conceivable, declared the merchant Edward Lucett; some monkies I have seen might feel injured by a comparison. Compounding Britons disgust was what seemed a repulsive lack of hygiene. 52. Winanghanha is to return to knowing: to know what we have always known. That how we are managing Country is not working and things need to dramatically change. 65. 28. Rights and the Oral History and Folklore Collection. Edward D. Ingraham (Philadelphia: T. & J. W. Johnson, 1853), 36. Court cases in the mid-19th century challenged the idea of British settlement at the time the rulings were in favour of the Crown. If there was any doubt that the Aborigines understood themselves to own their land, it was dispelled by the obvious fact that they did not acquiesce when the British occupied it. 30. The land would belong to the British soon enough anyway. To be sure, there were advocates of terra nullius in Britain and North America, and settlers trespassed in large numbers on the Indians land. It was enormous and populated by only a handful of hunter-gatherers, people so primitive that they did not farm or show any interest in trade, people who could offer no meaningful military resistance. 0000005771 00000 n 36. Many Americans, including free and formerly enslaved people, worked tirelessly to support the abolitionist movement. (Melbourne, 1868), ed. Under British colonial law, aboriginal Australians had no property rights in the land, and colonization accordingly vested ownership of the entire continent in the British government. When there were [n]o ploughshares to break up the landscape, Ovid agreed, there were no surveyors [p]egging out the boundaries of estates.[17] Humans had once been wanderers, without property in land, but when they settled down and began farming, they simultaneously established property rights. The abolitionist movement was the effort to end slavery, led by famous abolitionists like Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth and John Brown. Settlers in North America made their share of disparaging remarks about Indians, to be sure, but they also praised Indian technology, Indian social life, Indian political organization, and so on. This was the justification and the legal concept used by the British government to colonise Australia. In the mind of an educated Englishman, property in land went along with agriculture. This Latin term means land belonging to no one, which has been interpreted as a complete absence of people and additionally the absence of civilised people capable of land ownership.[1]. The history of an iconic declaration of resilience. North America had some empty places, but Australia sounded like an empty continent. Bruce Kercher, Debt, Seduction and Other Disasters: The Birth of Civil Law in Convict New South Wales (Sydney: Federation Press, 1996), 85; James Scott, Remarks on a Passage to Botany Bay, 17871792 (Sydney: Trustees of the Public Library of New South Wales, 1963), 34; H.W. 0000007289 00000 n 1. 72. Depriving the Aboriginal people of their land rights also contravenes the Universal Declaration of Rights Article 17, which upholds the individuals right to his property. startxref [64] No matter the context, terra nullius proved impossible to dislodge. Some of the early opposition to terra nullius came from the missionaries who worked among the Aborigines and the church organizations that supported them. That word is emblazoned still at the Aboriginal Tent Embassy on the lawns of the Old Parliament House in Canberra. How did the government remedy this? See also Tibullus, Elegies, trans. This will always be our land. : Penguin Books, 1982); British Parliamentary Papers: Colonies: Australia, 3:199. By the later part of the century, the land titles of a great many colonists rested on an initial purchase from the Indians. It is worn by men in dance and ceremony and is the central symbol on the Torres Strait Islander Flag. At the start this task turned out to be nearly as easy as Joseph Banks had predicted. It is a gain to the cause of truth and virtue for Christian England to possess those wilds, which lately were occupied by miserable natives, Pridden reasoned; and, while we own that it is wrong to do evil that good may come, yet may we, likewise, confess with thankfulness the Divine mercy and wisdom which have so often brought good out of the evil committed by our countrymen in these distant lands. To say that terra nullius was wrong was only to raise, not to answer, a difficult ethical question. 9. Horace Leonard Jones (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 191732), 3:207; Horace, The Complete Odes and Epodes with the Centennial Hymn, trans. British law was the law of the colony and usurped and superseded Aboriginal law. 3 June 2020. Can I get copies of items from the Library? trailer 35. This calculation played a part in the British decision to purchase land rather than seizing it and, after the American Revolution, in the American governments decision to continue doing so. You have reached the end of the main content. Strange as it may seem, marveled the judge David Collins, they have also their real estates. Gregory Blue et al. The Supreme Court of New South Wales registered its agreement in 1847. The North American colonies and New Zealand, by contrast, were settled first by small, weak groups operating largely outside the reach of the government. How do I declare my intention to publish? The Reverend Joseph Orton, a Methodist missionary in Australia in the 1830s, summed up the prevailing view. 46. Why? In one, the presiding judge said the mere introduction of British law did not extinguish Aboriginal customary law. Beaglehole, ed., Journals of Captain James Cook, 1:312; J. C. Beaglehole, ed., The Endeavour Journal of Joseph Banks 17681771 (Sydney: Angus & Robertson, 1962), 2:12223; Beaglehole, ed., Journals of Captain James Cook, 2:735; King, ed., In the Beginning , 115. I discuss British land policy in North America in Stuart Banner, How the Indians Lost Their Land (Harvard University Press, forthcoming). From the beginning, Britons interpreted disputes about land between themselves and the Aborigines as evidence that the Aborigines, not the settlers, lacked sufficient understanding of ownership. The world of becoming ascends. Unlike other peoples the British had encountered, the Aborigines seemed to show no interest in British manufactures. The High Court ruled the Meriam people (from the Murray Islands, which the Meriam people call Mer) were 'entitled as against the whole world to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of (most of) the lands of the Murray Islands'. There was not enough space in the world for a small society to claim too large an area, Vattel reasoned. Birds of Paradise: Ellis Rowan in New Guinea, Illustrating the Antipodes: George French Angas, Guidelines for the hire of the National Library venues, Director-General and Executive Member Dr Marie-Louise Ayres, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Employment Strategy 20132018, National Library of Australia Fellowships, National Library of Australia Scholarships, Communications and digital community strategy, Agency plan for the National Library of Australia, Collection deaccessioning and disposal policy, Selective collecting: overseas publications, Part 1: Disaster preparedness and prevention policy, Copying, access and publishing conditions for special collections, Policy on the illumination of collection material on display, Visitor access to and use of, medications and other personal medical equipment in the Library, Artwork around the foyer, exterior and grounds, Artwork in the Special Collections Reading Room, Donate to the National Library of Australia, Donate to support fellowships and scholarships, Scholarships and fellowships donation form, Cultural Gifts Program and tax incentives. 27. Critics of abolitionargued that it contradicted the U.S. Constitution, which left the option of slavery up to individual states. A treaty is a binding agreement between two or more states or sovereign powers. Despite all the recent work on early colonial land policy in Australia, particularly the work of Henry Reynolds and Bruce Kercher, these questions have never been fully answered. Terra nullius is such a basic and well-known fact of Australian history that it is easy to lose sight of how anomalous it was in the broader context of British colonization. By the 1840s the colonial government was concerned that there were too many half-caste children being born and that many of them quickly became victims of infanticide in Aboriginal communities. Setting aside small parcels for Aborigines was nothing new; by 1840 the government of New South Wales had been doing so for some time. 42. 17. In our opinion, we have exactly the same right to be here, that the older inhabitants have, explained the Southern Australian in 1839. In denying a new trial for a defendant convicted of stealing coal from land to which the Crown had reserved the mineral rights, the court affirmed that all the ungranted land in Australia belonged to the Crown. British Parliamentary Papers: Colonies: Australia, 2:147; Campbell to Burton, 22 June 1838, Supreme Court: Miscellaneous Correspondence Relating to Aborigines, 5/1161, 2:492, SRNSW; Clement Hodgkinson, Australia, from Port Macquarie to Moreton Bay (London: T. and W. Boone, 1845), 242; Henry William Haygarth, Reminiscences of Bush Life in Australia, During a Residence of Eight Years in the Interior (London, 1848) (London: John Murray, 1861), 107. When democracy is teetering and autocracy is rising. ] Sheridans responsehe believed the ground belonged to Governmentsuggests he understood the point the lawyer was trying to make. He knew about hope and he knew about justice. No European Nation has a right to occupy any part of their country, or settle among them without their voluntary consent. What were the steps that led to the recognition of Aboriginal land rights and native title? 0000005020 00000 n And a commercial people like the English invented more complex property arrangements, to suit their needs. The French explorer Nicholas Baudin was in New South Wales two years later, and he took the opportunity to give Governor Philip Gidley King a piece of his mind about terra nullius. For 50 years this embassy has stood as a reminder that we are still here. Would the Aborigines be better off, in this life and the next, as primitive pagan nomads or civilized Christian farmers? The dhari is a significant object for Torres Strait Islander people. Such privately inflicted punishments were necessary, the lawyer continued, because Aborigines could not be tried in colonial courts. Words. Whether to treat North America as terra nullius had been a topic of lively debate in the seventeenth century, but by Cooks lifetime the debate had long been over. In the end, the government of South Australia complied with the Colonial Offices instructions, not by purchasing land from the Aborigines, nor even by recognizing that the Aborigines had the right to refuse to cede it, but by authorizing the Protector of Aborigines, a colonial official, to participate in the process by which settlers selected plots of land. The concept of terra nullius, or land belonging to no-one, remained the legal principle on which British colonisation rested until 1992, when the High Court brought down its finding in the Mabo vs Queensland (No. 0000000016 00000 n While historians debate how and when the terra nullius legal concept was used to justify the colonisation of Australia, it is likely that Cook considered that the land belonged to no-one. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! We invite you to walk with us in a movement of the Australian people for a better future.. (London: James Burns, 1845), 7273; Grahams Town Journal, 22 February 1844, CO 386/155, p. 164, PRO; Lachlan Macquarie, Journals of His Tours in New South Wales and Van Diemens Land 18101822 (Sydney: Trustees of the Public Library of New South Wales, 1956), 160. 60. Berbentuk "Chapter Book" Sharon Morgan, Land Settlement in Early Tasmania: Creating an Antipodean England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 14360; John C. Weaver, Beyond the Fatal Shore: Pastoral Squatting and the Occupation of Australia, 1826 to 1852, American Historical Review 101 (1996): 9811007; Historical Records of New South Wales, 1(2):346, 2:769; Henry Reynolds, Fate of a Free People (Ringwood, Vic.